An error has occurred!

Please start the test again.

Our evaluation of your answers

It's good that you're starting to get to grips with the topic of S/4 transformation. Because before an implementation project, a thorough analysis of the initial situation and the objective is particularly important. Here you still seem to have some white spots. We would be happy to support you with targeted, tool-supported analyses and our S/4 expertise to ensure clarity before you set off. Here you can find out more about the procedure for a preliminary study.

It's good that you're starting to get to grips with the topic of S/4 Transformation. Because before an implementation project, a thorough analysis of the initial situation and the objective is particularly important. Here you still seem to have some white spots. We would be happy to support you with targeted, tool-supported analyses and our S/4 expertise to ensure clarity before you set off. Here you can find out more about the procedure for a preliminary study.

It's good that you're starting to get to grips with the topic of S/4 Transformation. Because before an implementation project, a thorough analysis of the initial situation and the objective is particularly important. Here you still seem to have some white spots. We would be happy to support you with targeted, tool-supported analyses and our S/4 expertise to ensure clarity before you set off. Here you can find out more about the procedure for a preliminary study. Here you can find out more about the procedure for a preliminary study.

You have obviously already given some thought to the S/4HANA transformation and already know roughly where you stand and in which direction it should go.

It may be that a system conversion followed by innovation cycles is the right approach for you.

Before you start, however, you should systematically check whether all the prerequisites for this have been met and exactly what activities you will be faced with. We can support you with our S/4 Conversion Accelerator. Read more about it here.

You have obviously already given some thought to the S/4HANA transformation and already know roughly where you stand and in which direction it should go.

The complexity of your project seems manageable, as you plan to transfer important scopes of the existing system into your new system.

It may be that a system conversion followed by innovation cycles is the right approach for you.

Before you start, however, you should systematically check whether all the prerequisites for this have been met and exactly what activities you will be faced with. We can support you with our S/4 Conversion Accelerator. Read more about it here.

You have obviously already given some thought to the S/4HANA transformation and already know roughly where you stand and in which direction it should go.

Based on your initial situation and objectives, you have a thoroughly complex project ahead of you. In order to disentangle the issues and make your project manageable and plannable, you should carry out a systematic and comprehensive preliminary study in which, for example, useful preliminary projects can be identified and dependencies between the required activities become clear.

It may be that a system conversion followed by innovation cycles is the right approach for you.

Before you start, however, you should systematically check whether all the prerequisites for this have been met and exactly what activities you will be faced with. We can support you with our S/4 Conversion Accelerator. Read more about it here.

You have obviously already given some thought to the S/4HANA transformation and already know roughly where you stand and in which direction things should go. You definitely want to take the opportunity to implement some improvements and innovations. Possibly a greenfield transformation is the right approach for you.

We will be happy to support you with our expertise from numerous preliminary studies carried out. Read more here.

You have obviously already given some thought to the S/4HANA transformation and already know roughly where you stand and in which direction things should go. You definitely want to take the opportunity to implement some improvements and innovations. Possibly a greenfield transformation is the right approach for you.

The complexity of your project seems manageable, as you plan to transfer important scopes of the existing system into your new system.

We will be happy to support you with our expertise from numerous preliminary studies carried out.  Read more here.

You have obviously already given some thought to the S/4HANA transformation and already know roughly where you stand and in which direction things should go. You definitely want to take the opportunity to implement some improvements and innovations. Possibly a greenfield transformation is the right approach for you.

Based on your initial situation and objectives, you have a thoroughly complex project ahead of you. In order to disentangle the issues and make your project manageable and plannable, you should carry out a systematic and comprehensive preliminary study in which, for example, useful preliminary projects can be identified and dependencies between the required activities become clear.

We will be happy to support you with our expertise from numerous preliminary studies carried out. Read more here.

The preliminary study as a construction kit consists of various elements that can be individually assembled and adapted to the customer's needs. Based on your responses, we have highlighted in color the task packages to which you should pay particular attention as part of a preliminary study. 

Feel free to contact us directly for a no-obligation initial consultation.

Strategy Check

The overall IT strategy does not only consider the current project (transition from ECC to S/4HANA). Rather, the overall strategy encompasses the entire IT architecture, which may also include other systems or functionalities in addition to this transition. For example, BW, GTS, HR, TM, EWM and C4C, which currently surround ECC as satellites, will in future surround the digital core of S/4HANA or be included in it. Here, it is necessary to examine how this IT structure, starting from the current system landscape, is to develop further in the next few years based on the strategic requirements into a target system landscape. The projects currently running or already planned in parallel with the project that affect the system landscape are included in the analysis. A key aspect is also the cloud strategy and the development evaluation of the system landscape in the direction of digitization. The deliverable for this work package is a roadmap that shows the development of the IT landscape in a high-level approach and thus outlines the long-term overall IT strategy for a digital transformation in the coming years. This also includes the target system architecture as a target image.

Conversion analysis

With the abat Conversion Accelerator, we have developed a methodology that clearly structures and simplifies all the necessary steps for the planned conversion. All relevant points are checked, and the existing SAP system is analyzed regarding technical and functional feasibility. All activities are collected in a backlog and ordered chronologically. In this way, the effort required for a system conversion can be defined very precisely. The project becomes "tangible", and the subsequent conversion can be implemented in a targeted and accelerated manner.

Identification of the Simplification Items

Simplification items can be used to check the possibility of switching to S/4HANA, indicating the effort required. In addition, the technical delta between the current release and the target release is shown. The Readiness Check, i.e. the higher-level service, already provides initial conclusions as to which processes are being used and in which areas a return to the SAP standard is possible based on best practice processes. This also includes the identification of added value. The list of simplification items can also form the basis for further activities such as the derivation of change and training measures.

Custom Code Check

To ensure the continued usability of existing processes and enhancements in the system, customer-specific code adjustments were to be implemented as part of the system conversion. abat has extended the SAP standard Custom Code Check with additional checks. This results in opportunities to optimize existing solutions. The result shows in which areas simplifications are possible, e.g., on return to the SAP standard or the simplified data model.

SAP Fiori Recommendation Report

The report checks in SAP ECC as well as S/4HANA systems which transactions were frequently used. This evaluation provides a recommendation as to which Fiori standard apps cover the process scope examined.

The result of this evaluation also provides the required standard SAP roles. With the help of these roles, the required content can be fully activated via Fiori Rapid Activation.

We recommend this procedure for Rapid Activation sandbox systems to enable a look and feel of the new interfaces at an early stage. In addition, this automatically determines for which of the transactions used there is already a UI5 interface and which transactions are still called from the SAP GUI.

We do not recommend activating all apps from the library, since unused apps might be activated as well, which leads to a confusing and in performant app landscape.

Migration Analysis

The transfer of existing data is a fundamental part of the introduction of S/4HANA. The question can also arise as to how a streamlining of the previous system in the system conversion approach is possible. abat provides clarity as part of the migration analysis as to which data is necessary for the changeover to S/4HANA. As part of the analysis, options and tools for migration are jointly identified. Another component is handling archiving data that is no longer required for direct access. Through early decisions and an optimal strategy, the project duration can be shortened, complexity in the project reduced and costs reduced. As a result, you get the security to deal with your data.

Process Innovation Check

Future success is essentially dependent on how much innovation a company dares to undertake. Especially in the context of digital transformation and rapid changes, in which entire markets are realigning themselves through disruption. The innovation building blocks of abat help, give security and provide ideas to maintain the right mix of change and innovation as well as stability from the tried and tested. AI-supported drone inventory, chatbot support in the sales process and Robotic Process Automation (RPA) are just a few examples here. 

Risk/potential Analysis

As part of the definition of an overall IT strategy, we also recommend performing a risk/potential analysis. The Business Scenario Recommendations Report (BSR Report) and the SAP Readiness Check for S/4HANA, which are run on the current ECC production system, serve as a basis. Based on the transactions currently used in ECC, the BSR Report shows the added value for processes and business scenarios through S/4HANA.

The Readiness Check shows all functionalities in the existing ECC system that have changed, been omitted or optimized in S/4HANA. It also lists the points in the customer's own programs that need to be adapted during a transition to S/4HANA.

For brownfield transitions, the Readiness Check is essential to make the necessary adjustments to the customer's own programming or to plan for the consideration of the changed functions.
In the case of a greenfield transition or in the hybrid approach, the check is used to divide the necessary major changes and adjustments in processes and Z programs into risk classes in the risk analysis.

Evaluation Matrix

As a basis for creating a project plan and a proposal for the project approach and an implementation variant, workshops are held with SAP process experts. The customer's requirements are collected and various alternatives for the introduction of S/4HANA are presented based on the requirements. A criteria catalog is created to evaluate these alternatives. Here, individual criteria that come into play in the decision are categorized, weighted, and evaluated together with the customer. Based on the criteria catalog, abat creates a quantitative basis for decision-making, evaluating the various alternatives. The goal is to identify the optimal transition strategy for the customer, i.e., a strategy that is best suited to the customer's individual initial situation and requirements.

Knowledge Transfer

For a successful S/4HANA transition, it is important to build up the relevant know-how required for this project phase.This knowledgeadds value to any further discussion on the subject of S/4HANA.
In the first step, the S/4HANA basics aretaught, which  clarifies the scope of the planned project and the associated opportunities (for standardization, innovations, synergies, etc.). At the same time, reservations are to be discussed and eliminated in dialog.
In the second part, the potential of S/4HANA is presented. With the solution, SAP promises the path to the "Intelligent Enterprise". abat presents corresponding concepts from the areas of Internet of Things, Fiori interfaces and operational reporting.

Scoping

For the process analysis, SAP's best practice processes for an S/4HANA implementation are used as a basis. As part of the preliminary analysis, the processes per module are discussed at level 2 (grouping of similar processes, broken down by area of responsibility or tasks), if necessary, in more detail. The goal is to identify the processes that are relevant for the prototype (scoping). In the follow-up, end-to-end processes that are required for the prototype are then compiled and any additional customizing requirements that may be necessary for building a prototype are identified. These processes are presented to the customer, in fit-to-standard workshops, as part of a system demo.

System Demo

In a look-and-feel approach, SAP's best-practice processes, supplemented by additional customizing settings, if necessary, are presented as a prototype in specialist workshops for processes selected with the customer. They form the basis for the fit-to-standard analysis, which in turn describes differences between the SAP best-practice processes and the target customer processes.

Prototyping

Based on SAP's best practice processes and enriched by additional abat best practice processes as well as configurations, master and transaction data, a prototype is created in the system. Due to the early inclusion of the system, the added values are identified at an early stage. Likewise, the question "What is the effort of a system conversation for our specific system?" or "What added values does S/4HANA offer me in my process?" can be answered directly, for example. The prototype can be used as an accelerator for the downstream project phases.

Fit-to-Standard

Methodically, the system demo results of the SAP best practice processes are documented by means of a fit-to-standard analysis. It ensures the fit, i.e., the accuracy of fit of the customer processes to the S/4HANA standard process shown. Specifically, the functionality is compared for each process. If there is a discrepancy between the standard process in the prototype and the target process desired by the customer, this is described as a gap. Gaps are assigned to a WRICEF category in parallel. The gaps and the proposedsolutions are described in the preliminary study. An initial effort estimate per gap is made using a T-shirt sizing.

Customized

Whether sizing the system landscape, a value check, identifying additional add-ons or end-2-end process solutions or your individual questions. Based on many successfully S/4HANA transformations, we know that every company and initial situation is different. We do justice to this with our customized building blocks for successful conversion in S/4HANA transformation projects. Together with you, we define the scope and content of the transformation.

The overall IT strategy does not only consider the current project (transition from ECC to S/4HANA). Rather, the overall strategy encompasses the entire IT architecture, which may also include other systems or functionalities in addition to this transition. For example, BW, GTS, HR, TM, EWM and C4C, which currently surround ECC as satellites, will in future surround the digital core of S/4HANA or be included in it. Here, it is necessary to examine how this IT structure, starting from the current system landscape, is to develop further in the next few years based on the strategic requirements into a target system landscape. The projects currently running or already planned in parallel with the project that affect the system landscape are included in the analysis. A key aspect is also the cloud strategy and the development evaluation of the system landscape in the direction of digitization. The deliverable for this work package is a roadmap that shows the development of the IT landscape in a high-level approach and thus outlines the long-term overall IT strategy for a digital transformation in the coming years. This also includes the target system architecture as a target image.

With the abat Conversion Accelerator, we have developed a methodology that clearly structures and simplifies all the necessary steps for the planned conversion. All relevant points are checked, and the existing SAP system is analyzed regarding technical and functional feasibility. All activities are collected in a backlog and ordered chronologically. In this way, the effort required for a system conversion can be defined very precisely. The project becomes "tangible", and the subsequent conversion can be implemented in a targeted and accelerated manner.

Simplification items can be used to check the possibility of switching to S/4HANA, indicating the effort required. In addition, the technical delta between the current release and the target release is shown. The Readiness Check, i.e. the higher-level service, already provides initial conclusions as to which processes are being used and in which areas a return to the SAP standard is possible based on best practice processes. This also includes the identification of added value. The list of simplification items can also form the basis for further activities such as the derivation of change and training measures.

To ensure the continued usability of existing processes and enhancements in the system, customer-specific code adjustments were to be implemented as part of the system conversion. abat has extended the SAP standard Custom Code Check with additional checks. This results in opportunities to optimize existing solutions. The result shows in which areas simplifications are possible, e.g., on return to the SAP standard or the simplified data model.

The report checks in SAP ECC as well as S/4HANA systems which transactions were frequently used. This evaluation provides a recommendation as to which Fiori standard apps cover the process scope examined.

The result of this evaluation also provides the required standard SAP roles. With the help of these roles, the required content can be fully activated via Fiori Rapid Activation.

We recommend this procedure for Rapid Activation sandbox systems to enable a look and feel of the new interfaces at an early stage. In addition, this automatically determines for which of the transactions used there is already a UI5 interface and which transactions are still called from the SAP GUI.

We do not recommend activating all apps from the library, since unused apps might be activated as well, which leads to a confusing and in performant app landscape.

The transfer of existing data is a fundamental part of the introduction of S/4HANA. The question can also arise as to how a streamlining of the previous system in the system conversion approach is possible. abat provides clarity as part of the migration analysis as to which data is necessary for the changeover to S/4HANA. As part of the analysis, options and tools for migration are jointly identified. Another component is handling archiving data that is no longer required for direct access. Through early decisions and an optimal strategy, the project duration can be shortened, complexity in the project reduced and costs reduced. As a result, you get the security to deal with your data.

Future success is essentially dependent on how much innovation a company dares to undertake. Especially in the context of digital transformation and rapid changes, in which entire markets are realigning themselves through disruption. The innovation building blocks of abat help, give security and provide ideas to maintain the right mix of change and innovation as well as stability from the tried and tested. AI-supported drone inventory, chatbot support in the sales process and Robotic Process Automation (RPA) are just a few examples here. 

As part of the definition of an overall IT strategy, we also recommend performing a risk/potential analysis. The Business Scenario Recommendations Report (BSR Report) and the SAP Readiness Check for S/4HANA, which are run on the current ECC production system, serve as a basis. Based on the transactions currently used in ECC, the BSR Report shows the added value for processes and business scenarios through S/4HANA.

The Readiness Check shows all functionalities in the existing ECC system that have changed, been omitted or optimized in S/4HANA. It also lists the points in the customer's own programs that need to be adapted during a transition to S/4HANA.

For brownfield transitions, the Readiness Check is essential to make the necessary adjustments to the customer's own programming or to plan for the consideration of the changed functions.
In the case of a greenfield transition or in the hybrid approach, the check is used to divide the necessary major changes and adjustments in processes and Z programs into risk classes in the risk analysis.

As a basis for creating a project plan and a proposal for the project approach and an implementation variant, workshops are held with SAP process experts. The customer's requirements are collected and various alternatives for the introduction of S/4HANA are presented based on the requirements. A criteria catalog is created to evaluate these alternatives. Here, individual criteria that come into play in the decision are categorized, weighted, and evaluated together with the customer. Based on the criteria catalog, abat creates a quantitative basis for decision-making, evaluating the various alternatives. The goal is to identify the optimal transition strategy for the customer, i.e., a strategy that is best suited to the customer's individual initial situation and requirements.

For a successful S/4HANA transition, it is important to build up the relevant know-how required for this project phase.This knowledgeadds value to any further discussion on the subject of S/4HANA.
In the first step, the S/4HANA basics aretaught, which  clarifies the scope of the planned project and the associated opportunities (for standardization, innovations, synergies, etc.). At the same time, reservations are to be discussed and eliminated in dialog.
In the second part, the potential of S/4HANA is presented. With the solution, SAP promises the path to the "Intelligent Enterprise". abat presents corresponding concepts from the areas of Internet of Things, Fiori interfaces and operational reporting.

For the process analysis, SAP's best practice processes for an S/4HANA implementation are used as a basis. As part of the preliminary analysis, the processes per module are discussed at level 2 (grouping of similar processes, broken down by area of responsibility or tasks), if necessary, in more detail. The goal is to identify the processes that are relevant for the prototype (scoping). In the follow-up, end-to-end processes that are required for the prototype are then compiled and any additional customizing requirements that may be necessary for building a prototype are identified. These processes are presented to the customer, in fit-to-standard workshops, as part of a system demo.

In a look-and-feel approach, SAP's best-practice processes, supplemented by additional customizing settings, if necessary, are presented as a prototype in specialist workshops for processes selected with the customer. They form the basis for the fit-to-standard analysis, which in turn describes differences between the SAP best-practice processes and the target customer processes.

Based on SAP's best practice processes and enriched by additional abat best practice processes as well as configurations, master and transaction data, a prototype is created in the system. Due to the early inclusion of the system, the added values are identified at an early stage. Likewise, the question "What is the effort of a system conversation for our specific system?" or "What added values does S/4HANA offer me in my process?" can be answered directly, for example. The prototype can be used as an accelerator for the downstream project phases.

Methodically, the system demo results of the SAP best practice processes are documented by means of a fit-to-standard analysis. It ensures the fit, i.e., the accuracy of fit of the customer processes to the S/4HANA standard process shown. Specifically, the functionality is compared for each process. If there is a discrepancy between the standard process in the prototype and the target process desired by the customer, this is described as a gap. Gaps are assigned to a WRICEF category in parallel. The gaps and the proposedsolutions are described in the preliminary study. An initial effort estimate per gap is made using a T-shirt sizing.

Whether sizing the system landscape, a value check, identifying additional add-ons or end-2-end process solutions or your individual questions. Based on many successfully S/4HANA transformations, we know that every company and initial situation is different. We do justice to this with our customized building blocks for successful conversion in S/4HANA transformation projects. Together with you, we define the scope and content of the transformation.

Our evaluation is based on your answers to the following questions:

1.objective / strategic orientation / digitization strategy

We have a digitization strategy and the conversion of our S/4 system plays a central role in it.

We do not have a digitization strategy and are implementing individual digitization projects on a selective basis.

We do not expect extensive improvements from an SAP conversion and want to implement it as cost-effectively as possible.

2. system landscape

We have a central SAP system on which the essential business processes are mapped.

Our SAP landscape has grown over many years and consists of several systems that are integrated into complex overall architectures. (Many interfaces etc.)

3. target architecture

The current architecture is to be retained as far as possible.

We don't yet know if there would be any benefits to changing the system landscape, so we can't yet say whether we want to keep the existing landscape.

We definitely want to use the S/4HANA conversion to modernize and/or significantly change our system landscape (e.g. by consolidating several systems, by using cloud + new technologies, ...) and/ or modernize existing systems/integrate them into SAP CORE.

4. integration business

Our specialist departments are very interested in the S/4HANA conversion and associate it with concrete expectations for improvements.

We do not yet have a clear picture of whether the specialist departments should also be involved in the project alongside the IT experts.

We view the S/4HANA conversion as an IT project and plan to involve the business departments only where absolutely necessary.

5. adaptation organizational structures

The organizational structures currently established in the SAP system(s) (company codes, plants, ...) should be retained in full/as far as possible.

We want to comprehensively revise and change organizational structures in the course of the S/4HANA conversion.

We do not know whether a revision of the organizational structures would be useful.

6. processes

Our business processes are completely or largely harmonized across the company.

There are very often different characteristics for identical processes in different organizational units within the company.

We have no visibility into whether and how business processes differ in different units.

7. standardization

In our current SAP system(s), we have made no/only a few deviations from the SAP standard.

We use customer-specific developments for numerous important processes.

We do not know exactly which and how many proprietary developments are even in use and how mission-critical they are.

Contact our SAP S/4HANA experts

Europe
Markus Fischer
Solution Architekt
+49 421 430460
China
Henrik Lienstromberg
Executive Director
+49 421 430460